The review of all scientific articles accepted for consideration is provided by the editorial board. The review is conducted by invited reviewers.
Reviewing in the journal "single blind" — the names of the reviewers are hidden from the author.
Terms and procedure of reviewing
The standard period for preparing one review is 2 weeks. Please note that the work of reviewers is carried out on a voluntary basis, and therefore the review period depends on their employment and may be extended. Based on the results of the review of the article, the reviewer chooses one of the possible conclusions:
- accept without modification,
- send for revision — after the author makes improvements, the article is sent for re-review,
- to reject.
As a rule, the scientific editor appoints reviewers for the article. However, if the reviewers disagree, the editor may involve additional reviewers.
When submitting an article for revision, the author must either correct the reviewer's comments or motivate the inability to do so. The standard time limit for completing an article is 2 weeks. If you need more time to correct your comments, please let the editorial board know on the article page.
According to the results of the review, the article is not returned to the author. The materials of the manuscript are not disclosed by the reviewers without the permission of the editorial board. Information and ideas obtained during the review process and related to possible benefits are not used for the personal purposes of the reviewer without the written consent of the author.
The editorial office stores the reviews for 5 years.
The editors send copies of reviews or a reasoned refusal to the authors of the submitted materials.
The editors send copies of the reviews to the Ministry of Education and Science of the Russian Federation if so requested by the authorities.